Naughty God

I have continued to devour Karen Armstrong’s stuff. On my iPad I am reading “A History of God“, and on my phone I am reading “The Great Transformation“. I actually can’t put either one down. The thing that went off today (very powerfully, actually; I had goosebumps when this one hit) is that the Christianity that I know is not necessarily the real Christianity (if that even exists).

Armstrong is discussing the division between Eastern Christianity (out of which comes Greek Orthodox, for example) vs. Western or “Latin” Christianity (initially Roman Catholicism, but all forms of Protestantism also fall into this category).

The issue of Sin is critical to this division. In the case of the Western tradition, the idea that physical matter is evil and corrupt crept in (borrowed from various forms of Greek philosophy). As Armstrong discusses in detail, during the early years of Roman Christianity, the leaders were so obsessed with sin (especially sex), that they seemed positively deranged. This slight dysfunction affected the theology profoundly. God became what I call a “Naughty God”, very demanding, cruel, judgmental, and so forth.

Eastern Christianity was not like this. First of all, the Father was regarded as so elevated as to be similar to Aristotle’s unmoved mover: Utterly unchanging and remote. Certainly completely incapable of relating to mere creatures like us. The idea of praying to the Father was anathema to these Christians. In this respect, Eastern Christianity actually resembles Buddhism more closely than Roman Christianity.

Since Eastern Christians never absorbed the idea that the physical universe is evil and fallen, the concept of sin was much less central to them. I find this intriguing because I have been steeped in Western Christianity for so long. It is simply amazing to me that other people who claim to be Christians believe so profoundly differently from what I was taught.

According to Armstrong, these Christians would have regarded many of the practices of modern Protestantism as idolatry. Like the idea that the Father is involved in human affairs, speaks to people, causes miracles and so forth. Although they had very spiritual lives, with many amazing experiences, that would simply not sit with the basic idea of the Father for them

More later.

2 thoughts on “Naughty God

  1. Ezekiel 28:26 gets at the heart of the sin issue. It says that he “corrupted his wisdom for the sake of his own splendor”. When the 2/3 of the angels fought against the dragon and his angels and won, they were not wielding swords, but were fighting in the not acknowledged as such spiritual world of memes, ideas, thoughts, incentives, motivations. They prevailed by believing God’s character over the promotion and belief in self. I believe that this is why physical reality even exists, to settle the question once and for all of “even if you, a created being could exist apart from me, could you really make it work?”. History, being a rather short affair and nowhere near the millions and billions claimed, is simply an exhaustive search of all possibilities before the eyes of the spirits, and the eyes of men through the record of history. In the end, there will be nothing more of evil in heaven, other than a smoke cloud off in the distance in one direction on the horizon. This is a visual image of the righteous person, who is conscious of the evil possibilities, but does not dwell upon them. He does not empower the thoughts whatsoever, and is glad to simply know enough to know better than ever go back there again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s